CITIZENS NEWS

Injecting chemicals is MORE DANGEROUS than eating them, so why is polysorbate 80 banned in ICE CREAM but allowed in VACCINES?

By sdwells // 2025-06-17

The double standards in the USA are deafening, blinding and mind-blowing, especially when it comes to chemicals and known carcinogens found in most vaccines that are banned in food. Wait, what? That’s right folks, they’re perfectly safe, according to the CDC, to inject into newborn babies and pregnant women, bypassing all body safety filters, including the skin, lungs and digestive tract, going directly into the blood and brain, but they’re banned in food because the FDA wants to “protect” you? Sure.

Chemical double standard: Polysorbate-80 is banned in food but injected into newborns – a dangerous practice

A growing scientific and ethical controversy has erupted over the use of Polysorbate-80 (PS-80), a synthetic emulsifier linked to intestinal aging and metabolic dysfunction when ingested — yet routinely injected into newborns through 22 different vaccines. While food regulators debate restricting PS-80 in processed foods, health authorities continue to defend its presence in vaccines, raising urgent questions about chemical safety standards and transparency in medicine. A study published in Food Research International found that PS-80 accelerates cellular aging in the intestines by triggering "lipotoxicity," flooding cells with toxic fats and inflammation. Food safety experts, including those cited by KFF Health News, warn that emulsifiers like PS-80 damage gut linings and alter microbiome balance. Despite these risks, vaccine manufacturers dismiss concerns, comparing injected doses to "an extremely tiny piece of a raisin" — a claim critics call dangerously misleading.

Bypassing natural defenses

"The stomach can filter some toxins, but injection bypasses all barriers," says Karl Jablonowski, a senior research scientist at Children’s Health Defense. Research confirms PS-80 is more toxic when injected, entering muscle tissue and the bloodstream directly. Pediatrician Dr. Lawrence Palevsky adds, "What ingredient needs to cross the blood-brain barrier in our children?" PS-80’s composition is also under scrutiny: It contains up to 355 compounds linked to hypersensitivity reactions, including anaphylaxis. Infants following the CDC’s vaccine schedule receive PS-80 at birth through RSV and hepatitis B shots — despite having underdeveloped detoxification systems. A study in the International Journal of Medical Sciences suggests this could contribute to sudden infant death syndrome (SIDS). Worse, undisclosed additives like organosiloxane, used to mask vaccine cloudiness, may amplify toxicity, per research by Dr. Arthur Brawer. The contradiction highlights a systemic failure: PS-80 faces scrutiny in food but remains unchallenged in vaccines. Advocates urge parents to research ingredients, demand transparency and support detox strategies. "The time for blind trust is over," argues one advocacy group, citing rising autoimmune disorders in children. The PS-80 paradox underscores a broken regulatory framework prioritizing industry convenience over child safety. As evidence mounts, parents are left to navigate a system where chemicals deemed unsafe for ice cream are injected into newborns without adequate scrutiny. The call for accountability grows louder—because when it comes to toxins, the dose doesn’t negate the principle: What’s unfit to eat should never be fit to inject. Bookmark Vaccines.news to your favorite independent websites for updates on experimental gene therapy injections that lead to autism, turbo cancer and Long-Vax-Syndrome. Sources for this article include: Pandemic.news NaturalNews.com NaturalHealth365.com

toxic ingredients vaccines toxins Big Pharma CDC poison FDA toxic chemicals big government banned insanity ice cream polysorbate 80 Dangerous Medicine dirty vaccines outrage absurd badhealth badmedicine vaccine wars pharmaceutical fraud