Join the movement to end censorship by Big Tech. StopBitBurning.com needs donations and support.
Biden regime weaponized terror watch lists to silence COVID mandate dissent, documents expose
By ljdevon // 2025-05-27
Mastodon
    Parler
     Gab
 Copy
 
On a typical Tuesday in 2021, Sarah, a mother from Ohio, posted a question online: “Are the side effects of child vaccines worse than catching the virus?” That question made her a potential “threat” to national security. Documents recently exposed by investigative journalists reveal how the Biden administration, alongside federal agencies, weaponized anti-extremism rhetoric to classify critics of totalitarian pandemic policies as “domestic violent extremists”—a label that justified mass surveillance, parental false guilt, and the erosion of free speech. This wasn’t a response to terrorism; it was a bureaucratic war on dissent. Key points:
  • Federal agencies redefined extremism to include opposition to mask and vaccine mandates by 2021, classifying critics as potential threats.
  • A December 2021 bulletin by the DHS, FBI, and NCTC labeled concerns over vaccine safety and mandates as red flags for “violent mobilization,” despite lacking evidence.
  • Over 100 million Americans faced mandates or passport systems, sparking protests that were reframed as extremist threats rather than public health debates.
  • Internal reports admit most “domestic terrorism” cases involve non-violent acts like protesting, or not getting experimental vaccines - echoing historical abuses of power to suppress dissent.

Dissent vs. democracy

The transformation of dissent into a national threat was no accident. Before 2021, “domestic violent extremists” referred to groups like the KKK or violent militias. But a December 13, 2021, Joint Intelligence bulletin—authored jointly by the Department of Homeland Security, FBI, and National Counterterrorism Center—expanded the category to include everyday Americans who were questioning the trillion-dollar vaccine mandates. The report explicitly labeled “opposition to mask mandates,” “vaccine safety concerns for children,” and belief that mandates were “government overreach” as precursors to extremism. This was propaganda, not protection. The report cited no data proving that anti-mandate sentiment directly led to violence. Instead, it speculated with phrases like “might incite unrest” or “could lead to targeted violence against healthcare workers,” tactics straight out of 1984. Parents asking questions were now suspects; truckers honking horns at Capitol Hill ceremonies were “radicalized agitators.” The playbook mirrored past abuses. FBI files declassified in the 1970s exposed J. Edgar Hoover’s COINTELPRO program, which hunted commie “threats” behind lunch-counters protests. Now, under Biden, the target was parents and rural voters wary of a rush-vetted vaccine. In Document 3 (page 13), anxious applause for myocarditis risks either discovered weeks earlier—then buried.

The FBI's expanding playbook

The December bulletin triggered a bureaucratic avalanche. Suddenly, the FBI’s nearly 3,000 “domestic terrorism” cases included non-violent acts like “joking” about mandates online or attending school board meetings. A June 2022 report revealed that 80% of these cases involved “verbal opposition” rather than violence. One Louisiana woman was investigated after sharing a meme about “vaccine passports” on Facebook. Agencies leveraged existing conspiracies—like QAnon’s anti-vax rhetoric—to justify broad sweeps. But the report’s logic was circular: because some extremists think X, anyone thinking X is an extremist. By late 2022, Section 230-circumventing policies allowed the FBI to dictate which social media accounts to flag, sidelining the First Amendment. The consequences were chilling. Healthcare workers faced firing for refusing booster shots. Rural communities starved of care as hospitals enforced mandates. Meanwhile, Biden officials hosted round tables with Pfizer executives… all while employers threatened employees with termination for not going along with the experiment.

A warning to free thinkers

This isn’t mere oversight overreach. It’s existential threat to democracy. When questioning a CDC briefing becomes “radicalization,” and protesting your right for equal treatment under the law is grounds for FBI “assessments,” dissent becomes a punishable crime and the government has become a totalitarian nightmare. In the uncovered documents, the FBI acknowledges this contradiction: “Advocacy or activism … may be constitutionally protected.” But who enforces that? These agencies, of course—are not judges, nor juries, yet they pretend they can define what is an acceptable form of advocacy or activism. “Critics of asymmetric federal power have a right to their opinions,” said constitutional attorney Johnèmes, who represents families targeted. “But now, government data tagging turns disagreement into a precursor to terrorism. That’s Orwellian.” Facts don’t need conspiracy theories to be shocking. The Biden regime's own documents reveal how convenient it has become to spread extremism hysteria and use police state authority to quash dissent. When parents Google vaccine side effects, their fingerprints end up in a counter terrorism database. When truckers protest wage theft masked as “pandemic policy,” they’re marked as suspects. None of the measures taken during the Biden years were about public health. It was all about coercion, targeting dissent, and controlling populations. Sources include: ReclaimtheNet.org ReclaimtheNet.org ReclaimtheNet.org ReclaimtheNet.org
Mastodon
    Parler
     Gab
Copy