CITIZENS NEWS

Merrick Garland’s departure raises questions about Oklahoma City bombing cover-up and legacy

By willowt // 2025-01-21

• As Attorney General Merrick Garland prepares to leave the DOJ, he faces accusations of concealing evidence in the 1995 Oklahoma City bombing case, including the existence of a second suspect, John Doe #2, and suppressing surveillance footage.
• Garland met with First Lady Hillary Clinton the day before a crucial preliminary hearing in the bombing case, raising questions about the nature of their discussion and its potential impact on the investigation.
• Critics, including investigative journalists and legal analysts, argue that Garland, who oversaw the prosecution of Timothy McVeigh, minimized the role of a potential accomplice and downplayed evidence suggesting McVeigh did not act alone.
• While supporters commend Garland for restoring the DOJ’s independence and morale, critics highlight his alleged mishandling of the Oklahoma City bombing case as a significant stain on his legacy, calling for a re-investigation.
• The resurgence of questions and new evidence has reignited calls for a fresh investigation into the bombing, with some commentators urging Garland to address white supremacist involvement by re-opening the case.

As Attorney General Merrick Garland prepares to leave the Department of Justice (DOJ), his tenure is under intense scrutiny, not only for his handling of politically charged investigations but also for resurfacing allegations tied to his role in the 1995 Oklahoma City bombing case. Garland, who once described his work on the bombing investigation as “the most important thing” he had ever done, now faces accusations of concealing critical evidence, including the existence of a second suspect, John Doe #2, and suppressing surveillance footage. The Oklahoma City bombing, which killed 168 people and injured hundreds more, remains one of the deadliest acts of domestic terrorism in U.S. history. Timothy McVeigh was convicted and executed for the attack, but questions about a potential accomplice have lingered for decades. Critics, including investigative journalists and legal analysts, allege that Garland, who oversaw the prosecution of McVeigh, played a role in obscuring evidence that pointed to a second individual involved in the bombing. A transcript from the April 27, 1995, preliminary hearing reveals that Garland, then a senior DOJ official, appeared to downplay the possibility of a second suspect. According to the transcript, Garland questioned witnesses in a manner that minimized references to John Doe #2, despite eyewitness accounts and other evidence suggesting McVeigh was not acting alone. Additionally, Garland’s handling of surveillance footage from the bombing has been called into question, with critics accusing him of suppressing video evidence that could have shed light on the involvement of others.

Clinton meeting raises eyebrows

Further fueling speculation is a recently uncovered detail from the Clinton White House visitor logs. On April 26, 1995 — the day before the preliminary hearing — Garland met with then-First Lady Hillary Clinton in the White House. The purpose of the meeting remains unclear, but critics argue that the timing and sensitivity of the case suggest the discussion may have been related to the bombing investigation. “Why did Merrick Garland meet with Hillary Clinton the day before the April 27th, 1995 preliminary hearing, and why did he try to conceal John Doe #2 and the surveillance tapes at that hearing?” asked one investigative journalist who has been examining the case for years. “This meeting raises serious questions about what was discussed and whether there was an effort to shape the narrative of the investigation.” The visitor logs, obtained through a Freedom of Information Act (FOIA) request, also reveal other curious entries, including individuals checked in under pseudonyms like “Donald Duck” and “Mickey Mouse.” While such practices are not uncommon for high-profile visitors seeking privacy, the lack of transparency has led to further speculation about who may have been involved in discussions related to the bombing.

Garland’s legacy under fire

Garland’s departure from the DOJ comes at a time when his legacy is being hotly debated. Supporters praise his efforts to restore the department’s independence and morale after the tumultuous Trump years, while critics argue that his tenure was marked by indecision and a failure to address pressing issues with urgency. The allegations surrounding the Oklahoma City bombing case add another layer of complexity to Garland’s legacy. For years, conspiracy theories about the bombing have circulated, often dismissed as fringe speculation. However, the emergence of new evidence and the reexamination of old records have reignited calls for a fresh investigation into the attack. “Merrick Garland should start a crusade against white supremacists by re-opening the 1995 Oklahoma City bombing case,” one commentator wrote. “The DOJ should identify and locate additional suspects, including the elusive John Doe #2.” Garland has not publicly addressed the allegations, and the DOJ has declined to comment on the matter. However, the timing of these revelations, as Garland exits his role, ensures that the controversy will continue to shadow his career.

A legacy of questions

Merrick Garland’s tenure as attorney general was defined by high-stakes investigations and political polarization. Yet, as he steps down, the focus has shifted to his earlier role in one of the most devastating acts of terrorism in U.S. history. The allegations of a cover-up in the Oklahoma City bombing case, coupled with the mysterious meeting with Hillary Clinton, raise troubling questions about transparency and accountability in the pursuit of justice. Whether these allegations will lead to a renewed investigation remains to be seen. But one thing is clear: Garland’s legacy, once defined by his reputation as a meticulous and fair-minded prosecutor, is now under a cloud of suspicion that may take years to dispel. For a nation still grappling with the scars of the Oklahoma City bombing, the search for truth and justice continues — and with it, the demand for answers about what really happened on that fateful day in 1995. Sources include: Threadreaderapp.com ABCNews.com WBALTV.com

treason corruption conspiracy big government deception deep state rigged Clinton insanity domestic terrorism criminal merrick garland DOJ collusion Oklahoma City bombing suppressed traitors coverup real investigations