Parler
Gab
"Former Japanese Prime Minister Shinzo Abe, a divisive arch-conservative and one of his nation's most powerful and influential figures, has died after being shot during a campaign speech Friday in western Japan, hospital officials said," the tweet noted.
Ponder this: How is someone "divisive" and "one of his nation's most powerful and influential figures" at the same time? Who is calling him "divisive" -- because it wasn't the vast majority of Japanese citizens, who obviously adored and respected him (hence how he became 'powerful' and 'influential' in the first place).
Newsbusters noted more hypocrisy:
And in the piece itself, international correspondent John Ruwitch used the “ultra-nationalist” [sic] label again and left kinder words to people like Indian Prime Minister Narendra Modi who said Abe was “a towering statesman, an outstanding leader, and a remarkable administrator."
Even in American politics, NPR couldn’t be bothered to cover the attempted assassination of U.S. Supreme Court Justice Kavanaugh. But in 2016, an NPR reporter described getting a kiss from the murderous communist Castro brothers of Cuba as the “blessing of the Holy Trinity.”
Another now-infamous headline following the death of a murderous lunatic goes to The Washington Post, which mourned ISIS founder Abu Bakr Al-Baghdadi, describing him as an "austere religious scholar at helm of Islamic State." The paper was summarily shamed into changing the headline and issuing an apology, but the left-wing Marxists who run the paper showed their hand and told everyone how they really felt with the original headline.
But for Abe, all the Post could muster was a tweet including a graphic claiming that he "leaves behind a mixed legacy." Really? He was influential and his people loved him; how is that "mixed"?
For Abe, The Post put out a tweet with a graphic saying he “leaves behind a mixed legacy.” Though in a follow-up tweet, they noted he was in the “Liberal Democratic Party,” possibly because they like those labels when viewed through the prism of American politics rather than the policies they promote in Japan.
There's more.
CBS Mornings got in on the bashing when foreign correspondent Elizabeth Palmer declared him to be a “polarizing figure” as well as “a right-wing nationalist and conservative” simply because he was a “fierce supporter of Japan's military.”
And why shouldn't he be? Japan's very close neighbor is China; both countries have a history of despising one another and are definitely at odds over control of several islands currently in Japanese hands but which Beijing wants. Any sane, competent Japanese leader in the modern age would be a "fierce supporter of Japan's military" in the face of such a threat.
But really, Abe's big "sin" was that he and former President Donald Trump were very close, and we know now these mainstream media extremists hate Trump.
One more thing: Following Abe's assassination, the ruling party of the "divisive" "polarizing" "right-wing nationalist and conservative" just won a massive landslide victory in elections.
So much for the credibility of our 'mainstream media.'
Sources include:
Yahoo.com
Newsbusters.org
They are screwing with the weather maps: SUN is BAD!
By News Editors // Share
“Morally and intellectually corrupt”: UCLA professor resigns in protest over viewpoint intolerance
By News Editors // Share
‘Openly queer teacher’ admits to socially transitioning 3rd grade students
By News Editors // Share
The end of meat? Dutch “green” policies force dairy farmer to cull 95% of his herd
By Ethan Huff // Share
UAE and U.S. forge AI-powered drone alliance amid growing military tech race with Iran and China
By kevinhughes // Share
Avocado: The skin superfood for enhanced elasticity and firmness
By newseditors // Share
A systemic breakdown on the nation's highways as California cancels 17,000 CDLs
By willowt // Share
A temporary truce: Trump ends historic 43-day government shutdown
By willowt // Share