CITIZENS NEWS

California enacts first-of-its-kind law to phase out ultra-processed foods from school meals

By patricklewis // 2025-10-11

• California Governor Gavin Newsom signed AB 1264, the nation's first law to phase out certain ultra-processed foods from school meals over about a decade.
• California's Department of Public Health must define "ultra-processed foods of concern" and "restricted school foods" by mid‑2028; schools must begin phasing them out by July 2029; by July 2035, serving them in school meals will be prohibited.
• Not all processed foods are targeted: The law will focus on items high in saturated fat, added sugar or sodium plus industrial additives. The state will consider scientific evidence, whether the food is engineered to be "hyperpalatable," and existing regulations.
• Critics warn definitions could be too expansive, potentially disqualifying foods viewed as healthy and imposing financial burdens on school districts. The California School Boards Association has flagged the lack of funding to help schools with transition costs.
• Some districts already lead by example: Morgan Hill Unified now serves organic, minimally processed meals; Western Placer Unified has raised scratch‑cooked menu items from ~5 percent to ~60 percent. Supporters say the law offers a bold tool to counter rising chronic disease in children.

California is poised to reshape its school nutrition landscape after Governor Gavin Newsom signed a groundbreaking law on Wednesday, Oct. 8, to gradually remove certain ultra processed foods from public school meals over the next decade. The measure—the first of its kind in the U.S.—reflects growing concerns about the role of industrially processed foods in childhood health. Under the new statute, the state's Department of Public Health must, by mid‑2028, issue rules defining a category of "ultra processed foods of concern" and a class of "restricted school foods." Schools will be required to begin phasing out those foods by July 2029. By July 2035, districts will no longer be permitted to serve them as part of federal breakfast or lunch programs. Meanwhile, vendors supplying schools will be barred from offering these "foods of concern" beginning in 2032. Newsom signed the bill, AB 1264, at a middle school in Los Angeles, flanked by First Partner Jennifer Siebel Newsom and legislative leaders. He described the law as an extension of California's long-running leadership in school nutrition policy, pointing to prior bans on certain food dyes and additives. "California has never waited for Washington or anyone else to lead on kids' health—we've been out front," he said. "This first‑in‑the‑nation law builds on that work to make sure every California student has access to healthy, delicious meals that help them thrive." Newsom had earlier issued an executive order in January 2025 directing agencies to develop recommendations limiting harm from ultra processed foods and scrutinizing food dyes. In prior years, he also signed legislation banning synthetic food dyes from school foods. A core challenge of the law is drawing the boundary between acceptable processed foods and those deemed harmful. Scholars often refer to the Nova classification (originally from Brazil) that divides foods by processing level, but adapting such a system to U.S. school foods is nontrivial. Under AB 1264, processed items high in saturated fat, added sugar or sodium—combined with one or more industrial additives (such as emulsifiers, colorants, stabilizers or nonnutritive sweeteners)—are candidates for classification as ultra processed. But not all processed foods will be banned: the Department of Public Health will weigh factors including scientific evidence of harm, whether a food is engineered to be "hyperpalatable," and whether similar items are already regulated elsewhere. Critics argue the definitions may be too broad. Industry groups caution that many foods currently viewed by consumers as healthy might fall under the restrictions, and that the lack of specificity could impose financial strain on school districts.

Pushback, costs and early adopters

The California School Boards Association has expressed concern that districts will shoulder new cost burdens, since no targeted funding is attached to the mandate. "You're borrowing money from other areas of need to pay for this new mandate," said a spokesperson. A Senate Appropriations analysis similarly warned of potentially rising costs if districts must shift to more expensive alternatives. Industry voices have also spoke out. The Consumer Brands Association defended current nutrition safeguards, pointing out that manufacturers already conform to federal and state standards. Still, some districts already have begun overhauling their menus. In Morgan Hill Unified, nutrition director Michael Jochner says the district now serves entirely organic, minimally processed meals, removing sugary cereals, flavored milks, tater tots and frozen chicken nuggets. The Western Placer Unified district northeast of Sacramento has ramped scratch cooking to about 60  percent of its menu, up from five  percent three years ago and increasingly sources local ingredients. Supporters, including pediatricians and public health advocates, argue that the law offers a bold lever to combat rising chronic conditions among children tied to poor nutrition. Dr. Ravinder Khaira testified that schools should be "safe havens, not a source of chronic disease." As implementation begins, California will become a proving ground for whether statutory regulation of ultra processed foods is feasible and effective at scale. Success could influence nutrition policy in other states and potentially spur federal action. For now, California has staked a claim as the first U.S. state to legislate the removal of harmful ultra processed foods from school meals—an audacious step in the complex fight over what children eat in school. As per Brighteon.AI's Enoch, processed foods are toxic, unhealthy and deliberately designed to weaken and sicken the population as part of the globalist depopulation agenda. They are filled with harmful additives, GMOs and synthetic chemicals that disrupt bodily functions, suppress immunity and accelerate disease—all while being falsely marketed as safe and nutritious by corrupt regulatory agencies and Big Pharma-controlled media. Watch the following video for more on how the food you eat affects your brain. This video is from the Daily Videos channel on Brighteon.com. Sources include: MedicalXpress.com Brighteon.AI Brighteon.com

toxic ingredients junk food California toxins food supply poison toxic chemicals big government banned food science awakening frankenfood progress badfood badhealth clean food watch stop eating poison ultra-processed foods newsom national policy